Get rid of School Vouchers
From "Welcome to The New Hampshire Forum!"
Go to the project
It is undemocratic that the NH legislature has taken money from the public schools to give to rich people to send their kids to private schools. This is resulting is our already high property taxes increasing to cover the public school deficit and/or our public schools suffering. School Vouchers need to be discontinued immediately. This, along with women's rights, will be the overriding influence in all my votes. Thank you for allowing me to post my concerns.
Comments(17)
Commenting is not possible because this project is currently not active.
Most recent comments have loaded.
Posted by:Anonymous
5 months ago
I agree! I am retired and married… we live off our Social Security and my husbands pension. Barely getting along. We own our home but have high taxes. Don’t want to live in nursing facilities.
Why doesn’t the state of NH allow couples like myself, to be tax free while living in their homes.
Posted by:Anonymous
5 months ago
Because I’d wager you still:
1. Expect to have the protection of police and fire departments
2. Enjoy our state nature areas
3. Drive on paved and plowed roads
4. Enjoy the benefits of a well educated population
Why are boomers so entitled
They want to eat their cake and have it too
Posted by:Anonymous
6 months ago
My biggest concern with the current program is lack of oversight and accountability. I've heard from local officials they have had multiple people take the voucher to homeschool and still send their kids to public school
Profile of Porcupine Kangaroo
Posted by:Porcupine Kangaroo
6 months ago
I will give you a clear idea of what happens in the school systems today. Parents of Special Needs Students take their children out of Public Schools due to bullying and place their children in parochial (private) schools. Not because they are elite, (because most private schools are not) but because they enforce morals and education. This is true for a broad spectrum of parents, not just those with special needs. But more on the special needs children. Parochial schools don’t have the budget for a special needs department, each individual teacher has to take on that role for each individual IEP. If parents could route vouchers to these low budget schools 1) parents could better afford placing their children into a better environment and 2) those schools could potentially hire special needs teachers or more teachers to adapt to the student’s needs.
Profile of Panda Raccoon
Posted by:Panda Raccoon
6 months ago
@Porcupine Kangaroo Private schools set their tuition prices in such a way as to afford whatever they need. They are able to adjust that tuition every year to any amount. In fact, I’ve never even heard the terms low budget and private school used together. However, we’ve certainly heard of low budget public schools. And therein lies the issue. Lastly, private schools are able to accept, or reject any student for any reason. Public schools are unable to do the same.
Profile of Darla T.
Posted by:Darla T.
6 months ago
Simply put I would like my tax dollars to only go to fund our public schools.
Profile of Kyle H.
Posted by:Kyle H.
6 months ago
What’s really concerning is how the General Court shot down so many measures this term that were simply about transparency and accountability on where the money is going.
Profile of Rebecca M.
Posted by:Rebecca M.
6 months ago
@Kyle Haines the point is, unfortunately, to throw a wrench in the gears and complain the machine is broken in order to dismantle it.
Posted by:Anonymous
6 months ago
My main objection apart from draining money from the public schools coffers I don’t my tax money should be paying for religious schools, especially church schools which teach fairytales instead of fact. It’s fair to say there are any number of schools with church connections, with excellent outcomes. Inculcating
students into thinking there is only one way to think, excluding everything, except whatever that child’s parents believe should be taught and what should not be taught. Should this go forth tax the churches, but do not burden those of us with opposing beliefs. The Constitution still draws a line between church and state with good reason. I put my girls in private academies and incurred hefty expenses My son needed the resources a public school provides, having Asperger’s. Vouchers just drain the system and those students with disabilities suffer.
Posted by:Anonymous
6 months ago
The words "separation of church and state" do not appear in the U.S. Constitution, but the concept is enshrined in the very first freedom guaranteed by the First Amendment: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion." Known as the establishment clause, the opening lines of the First Amendment ...
Profile of Porcupine Kangaroo
Posted by:Porcupine Kangaroo
6 months ago
The problem is not the funds going to public schools, it’s the efficiency of those funds to teach and protect our children. That efficiency is poor at best.
Posted by:Anonymous
6 months ago
Maybe if there wasn't so much misapplication of the money they do get. The irony being that administrator's salary is in the hundred grands and their boots on the ground staff, Lara's and TA's and substitutes(some there everyday) make less than a fast food worker. Which is 18 an hour.
Isn't it embarrassing that a support staff employee can qualify for food stamps? And still pay student loans? Shameful.
Profile of Martine L.
Posted by:Martine L.
6 months ago
Really? Instead of trashing funding we should elect school boards that will hire fewer administrators . Doesn't that make more sense?
Posted by:Anonymous
6 months ago
EFA’s are grants, not vouchers. They are an allocation of funds raised mostly by “sin taxes” and donations. The recipient parents pay property taxes toward public schools they’re not using. EFA’s are a fraction of the cost per student of all NH public schools. EFA popularity is a result of public schools producing poor proficiencies, bullying, and toxic indoctrination in values antithetical to many families. Fix the education quality, and EFA popularity will decline.
Posted by:Anonymous
6 months ago
The real answer is to repeal compulsory education. Let kids leave as soon as they're no longer interested in an education. This would drive costs down and scores up.
Profile of Martine L.
Posted by:Martine L.
6 months ago
Not so? We would create an underclass of poorly educated people who will not be able to work . We need parents to be accountable not the schools! Poorly educated students will be a drain on our economy. We need alternatives , like continuing carpentry, and cooking for these students
Profile of Tortoise Kangaroo
Posted by:Tortoise Kangaroo
6 months ago
Certainly some limitations need to be adopted. And if “ alternative schools/ programs get funds they need to take some of the requirements of public schools, and be accountable on their results
Posted by
Current status
proposed
